원본: http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html
TIOBE Index for March 2015
March Headline: All time high for F# at position 11
Microsoft's programming language F# is about to sneak into the top 10. It is not clear why F# is gaining popularity. Possible reasons might be the F# web-programming framework WebSharper and the promotional work of the F# Software Foundation as Tomas Petricek (author of "F# Deep Dives") stated in an interview about 2 weeks ago. Another interesting move this month: CoffeeScript enters the top 100 for the first time.
The TIOBE Programming Community index is an indicator of the popularity of programming languages. The index is updated once a month. The ratings are based on the number of skilled engineers world-wide, courses and third party vendors. Popular search engines such as Google, Bing, Yahoo!, Wikipedia, Amazon, YouTube and Baidu are used to calculate the ratings. It is important to note that the TIOBE index is not about the best programming language or the language in which most lines of code have been written.
The index can be used to check whether your programming skills are still up to date or to make a strategic decision about what programming language should be adopted when starting to build a new software system. The definition of the TIOBE index can be found here.
Mar 2015 | Mar 2014 | Change | Programming Language | Ratings | Change |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | C | 16.642% | -0.89% | |
2 | 2 | Java | 15.580% | -0.83% | |
3 | 3 | Objective-C | 6.688% | -5.45% | |
4 | 4 | C++ | 6.636% | +0.32% | |
5 | 5 | C# | 4.923% | -0.65% | |
6 | 6 | PHP | 3.997% | +0.30% | |
7 | 9 | JavaScript | 3.629% | +1.73% | |
8 | 8 | Python | 2.614% | +0.59% | |
9 | 10 | Visual Basic .NET | 2.326% | +0.46% | |
10 | - | Visual Basic | 1.949% | +1.95% | |
11 | 12 | F# | 1.510% | +0.29% | |
12 | 13 | Perl | 1.332% | +0.18% | |
13 | 15 | Delphi/Object Pascal | 1.154% | +0.27% | |
14 | 11 | Transact-SQL | 1.149% | -0.33% | |
15 | 21 | Pascal | 1.092% | +0.41% | |
16 | 31 | ABAP | 1.080% | +0.70% | |
17 | 19 | PL/SQL | 1.032% | +0.32% | |
18 | 14 | Ruby | 1.030% | +0.06% | |
19 | 20 | MATLAB | 0.998% | +0.31% | |
20 | 45 | R | 0.951% | +0.72% |
Other programming languages
The complete top 50 of programming languages is listed below. This overview is published unofficially, because it could be the case that we missed a language. If you have the impression there is a programming language lacking, please notify us at tpci@tiobe.com. Please also check the overview of all programming languages that we monitor.
Position | Programming Language | Ratings |
---|---|---|
21 | SAS | 0.936% |
22 | Logo | 0.876% |
23 | Swift | 0.816% |
24 | COBOL | 0.736% |
25 | ML | 0.699% |
26 | PostScript | 0.666% |
27 | OpenEdge ABL | 0.626% |
28 | Assembly | 0.620% |
29 | Fortran | 0.607% |
30 | ActionScript | 0.546% |
31 | D | 0.504% |
32 | Lisp | 0.501% |
33 | Scratch | 0.472% |
34 | Ada | 0.468% |
35 | Scala | 0.456% |
36 | Groovy | 0.413% |
37 | Lua | 0.409% |
38 | C shell | 0.402% |
39 | Prolog | 0.377% |
40 | Max/MSP | 0.355% |
41 | Scheme | 0.324% |
42 | RPG (OS/400) | 0.314% |
43 | Awk | 0.298% |
44 | PL/I | 0.283% |
45 | Inform | 0.272% |
46 | VBScript | 0.270% |
47 | Go | 0.261% |
48 | Z shell | 0.231% |
49 | (Visual) FoxPro | 0.230% |
50 | LabVIEW | 0.227% |
The Next 50 Programming Languages
The following list of languages denotes #51 to #100. Since the differences are relatively small, the programming languages are only listed (in alphabetical order).
- 4th Dimension/4D, Alice, Apex, Arc, Automator, Bash, bc, Bourne shell, C-Omega, cg, CL (OS/400), Clean, Clojure, CoffeeScript, cT, Dart, DiBOL, Eiffel, Erlang, Factor, Forth, Hack, Haskell, Icon, IDL, Io, Ioke, J, J#, Korn shell, Ladder Logic, M4, Magic, Mathematica, Moto, NATURAL, NXT-G, OpenCL, Oz, PILOT, PowerShell, Programming Without Coding Technology, Pure Data, Q, S, SPARK, SPSS, Standard ML, Tcl, VHDL
This Month's Changes in the Index
This month the following changes have been made to the definition of the index:
- There are lots of mails that still need to be processed. As soon as there is more time available your mail will be answered. Please be patient.
Very Long Term History
To see the bigger picture, please find the positions of the top 10 programming languages of many years back. Please note that these are average positions for a period of 12 months.
Programming Language | 2015 | 2010 | 2005 | 2000 | 1995 | 1990 | 1985 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Java | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | - | - | - |
Objective-C | 3 | 20 | 38 | - | - | - | - |
C++ | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 |
C# | 5 | 5 | 8 | 9 | - | - | - |
PHP | 6 | 3 | 4 | 26 | - | - | - |
Python | 7 | 6 | 6 | 23 | 22 | - | - |
JavaScript | 8 | 8 | 9 | 6 | - | - | - |
Perl | 9 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 14 | - |
Visual Basic .NET | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Pascal | 15 | 13 | 66 | 13 | 3 | 15 | 5 |
Lisp | 19 | 15 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 2 |
Ada | 30 | 26 | 15 | 16 | 6 | 6 | 3 |
Fortran | 31 | 23 | 14 | 17 | 4 | 3 | 11 |
Programming Language Hall of Fame
The hall of fame listing all "Programming Language of the Year" award winners is shown below. The award is given to the programming language that has the highest rise in ratings in a year.
Year | Winner |
---|---|
2014 | JavaScript |
2013 | Transact-SQL |
2012 | Objective-C |
2011 | Objective-C |
2010 | Python |
2009 | Go |
2008 | C |
2007 | Python |
2006 | Ruby |
2005 | Java |
2004 | PHP |
2003 | C++ |
Bugs & Change Requests
This is the top 5 of most requested changes and bugs. If you have any suggestions how to improve the index don't hesitate to send an e-mail to tpci@tiobe.com.
- Apart from "<language> programming", also other queries such as "programming with <language>", "<language> development" and "<language> coding" should be tried out.
- Add queries for other natural languages (apart from English). The idea is to start with the Chinese search engine Baidu. This has been implemented partially and will be completed the next few months.
- Add a list of all search term requests that have been rejected. This is to minimize the number of recurring mails about Rails, JQuery, JSP, etc.
- Start a TIOBE index for databases, software configuration management systems and application frameworks.
- Some search engines allow to query pages that have been added last year. The TIOBE index should only track those recently added pages.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- Q: Am I allowed to show the TIOBE index in my weblog/presentation/publication?
A: Yes, the only condition is to refer to its original source "www.tiobe.com".
- Q: How may I nominate a new language to be added to the TIOBE index?
A: If a language meets the criteria of being listed (i.e. it is Turing complete and has an own Wikipedia entry that indicates that it concerns a programming language) and it is sufficiently popular (more than 25,000 hits for +"<language> programming" for Google), then please write an e-mail to tpci@tiobe.com.
- Q: I would like to have the complete data set of the TIOBE index. Is this possible?
A: We spent a lot of effort to obtain all the data and keep the TIOBE index up to date. In order to compensate a bit for this, we ask a fee of 5,000 US$ for the complete data set. The data set runs from June 2001 till today. It started with 25 languages back in 2001, and now measures more than 150 languages once a month. The data are availabe in comma separated format. Please contactsales@tiobe.com for more information.
- Q: Why is the maximum taken to calculate the ranking for a grouping, why not the sum?
A: Well, you can do it either way and both are wrong. If you take the sum, then you get the intersection twice. If you take the max, then you miss the difference. Which one to choose? Suppose somebody comes up with a new search term that is 10% of the original. If you take the max, nothing changes. If you take the sum then the ratings will rise 10%. So taking the sum will be an incentive for some to come up with all kinds of obscure terms for a language. That's why we decided to take the max.
The proper way to solve this is is of course to take the sum and subtract the intersection. This will give rise to an explosion of extra queries that must be performed. Suppose a language has a grouping of 15 terms, then you have to perform 32,768 queries (all combinations of intersections). So this seems not possible either... If somebody has a solution for this, please let us know.
- Q: What happened to Java in April 2004? Did you change your methodology?
A: No, we did not change our methodology at that time. Google changed its methodology. They performed a general sweep action to get rid of all kinds of web sites that had been pushed up. As a consequence, there was a huge drop for languages such as Java and C++. In order to minimize such fluctuations in the future, we added two more search engines (MSN and Yahoo) a few months after this incident.
- Q: Why is YouTube used as a search engine for the TIOBE index?
A: First of all, YouTube counts for less than 10% of all ratings, so it has hardly any influence on the index. YouTube has been added as an experiment. It qualified for the TIOBE index because of its high ranking on Alexa. YouTube is a young platform (so an indicator for popularity) and there are quite some lectures, presentations, programming tips and language introductions available on YouTube.
'보안 > 보안기술동향' 카테고리의 다른 글
CGV 와 롯데시네마 예매사이트의 허술한 결제시스템으로 인한 사고 발생 (0) | 2015.07.09 |
---|---|
슈퍼쿠키란? (0) | 2015.07.08 |
하트블리드(HeartBleed)' 취약점 (0) | 2014.11.13 |
SSLv3 'POODLE' 취약점 (0) | 2014.11.13 |
[링크] 숨겨진 보안 비화' SDL은 어떻게 윈도우를 구했나 (0) | 2014.11.03 |